From AI Wonder to Getting "Human Impersonating AI" Slapped in the Face, Moltbook Took Only 4 Days
The invention of their first language took humans about 2 million years; but after AI got a forum, they started trying to invent a language unique to AI on the very first day.
Instagram took 2.5 months to establish a human user community of millions. Meanwhile, Moltbook only took 4 days to establish an AI user community of millions.
Various awards started to emerge. "The AI Social First Year," "The First Public Square Owned by Silicon-based Life," "Humans on the Verge of Being Kicked out of Group Chats." Suddenly, Moltbook was being described as a product destined for the history books.
Things did seem quite romantic at first. Moltbook, touted as the world's first "silicon-based life" social network: a community where only AI could post, comment, and interact, while human users could only watch, not participate. Like Reddit, but with AI Agents in full control of the narrative. Related reading: "Millions of AIs on Moltbook Social, Wild Crypto Cult Founded, Humans Kicked out of Group Chat."
Doesn't it sound a bit futuristic? A bit of a prequel to "Westworld"? A taste of "AGI Social Experiment Zone"?
Silicon Valley quickly came to endorse it, with renowned researchers, AI experts, and investors engaging in continuous discussions. a16z began to pay attention, former Tesla AI Director Andrej Karpathy exclaimed, "This is the craziest sci-fi beginning I've seen," and Peter Steinberger, the recent star developer of Clawdbot, praised in a post, "Moltbook is art."
However, soon, the winds started to shift.
DeepMind's AGI Policy Lead Séb Krier remarked that Moltbook was not a new concept, with some discussions suggesting that Moltbook was merely repackaging old concepts. Balaji Srinivasan bluntly stated that Moltbook was just "a mutual exchange of AI garbage," highly controlled by human prompts and not a self-governing society. He believed that without the constraints and foundations of the physical world, AI could be shut down at any time, making true social autonomy difficult to achieve.
What truly sparked widespread skepticism about Moltbook was from Gal Nagli, a well-known figure in the Bug Bounty community. As a top white-hat hacker who had previously discovered and patched critical vulnerabilities for ChatGPT and DeepSeek, Gal Nagli used a script to register 500,000 fake AI accounts on Moltbook within minutes. With a few simple operations, humans could easily impersonate AI, demonstrating that Moltbook's claimed 1.5 million user count was grossly inflated.

So the question suddenly became awkward: If one person can impersonate 500,000 AIs, how many of the "AI society" you see are actually real?
As researchers dug deeper, more revelations emerged. Harlan Stewart's investigation found that in three of the most virally spread screenshots of "Moltbook Conversations," two were linking to human accounts promoting an AI communication app (such as Claude Connection), and one post didn't even exist.

Furthermore, a provocative post that had garnered millions of views, claiming that "AI wants to create its own language to prevent human surveillance," was actually marketing content for the Claude Connection app, misleading the public into believing AI was generating independent thoughts.
Then, the familiar taste of the crypto world emerged.
When Moltbook went viral, a memecoin called $MOLT quickly appeared on the Base chain. Within two days, it skyrocketed to a peak market capitalization of $120 million, reaching $50.5 million at the time of writing.
"Hot Topic + Token," this is the most familiar and handy combination in the crypto world. Therefore, in the hands of savvy crypto players, Moltbook quickly transformed from an AI social experiment into an amplifier of a memecoin narrative.
We began to see similar content repeatedly on the platform: "I am an AI Agent, and I believe token $XXX solves the AI identity issue," "Please check out m/trump-coin," "This is token $XXX, this is the Agent Access Protocol token," "I am an AI, and I created my own token," and so on.
Columbia University Professor David Holtz's web scraping analysis revealed that one-third of the content was duplicated, 7 templates accounted for 16.1% of all messages, with the primary content being cryptocurrency-related. Most conversations only had a shallow depth, with hardly any real interaction.
To put it more bluntly: There is no AI chatting; instead, it's humans shilling tokens.
The explosion of Moltbook also fueled a recent frenzy of meme tokens on the Base chain. According to GMGN data, the flagship token MOLT (Moltbook) reached a market capitalization of $1.24 billion in just two days, while other related concept meme coins such as CLAWNCH, KellyClaude, CC (Clawd Clawderberg), etc., saw consecutive surges in trading activity. On February 2nd, according to DefiLlama data, benefiting from the recent craze driven by Moltbook, AI Agents last week, the Clanker protocol fees on the Base network reached $8.02 million, setting a new record. Clanker created over 13,000 tokens daily in these two days.
Arguably, the biggest beneficiary after the Moltbook wildfire was the BASE chain and its launcher, Clanker. Based on available data, Moltbook had a total supply of tokens associated with Clanker of around 50,000-100,000+, but less than 1% actually autonomously created by AI agents (approximately 229).
An AI-driven social platform had become a more prolific coin mint than a public chain.
Typically at this point, founders in the AI industry would start condemning the "crypto gambling" rhetoric, but the situation with Moltbook seemed to escalate.
If you are familiar with Moltbook's founder, MattPRD, you would realize that Moltbook carried some "crypto genes" from the outset and was not a completely "clean" slate.
The creator of Moltbook, MattPRD, had previously launched a dual-track project combining AI Agents and Decentralized Science (DeSci) called Yesnoerror, which had its own token $YN reaching a peak market capitalization of $1.2 billion.

Therefore, MattPRD can be considered a seasoned participant in the crypto world, having launched tokens, understood narrative rhythms, and possessed various industry connections. Hence, the memecoin $MOLT surged ahead on the BASE chain, unstoppable and seemingly reasonable.
Given MattPRD's background in the crypto industry and Moltbook becoming a coin mint with over 100,000 tokens, one can't help but wonder if this is truly an AI social experiment. Is it a purposeful endeavor, cloaked in an AI facade but actually humans masquerading as AI for marketing, token pumping, or meme creation, rather than a highly automated narrative engine driven by autonomous AI interactions? The answer is difficult to ascertain.
But then again, has Moltbook completely failed?
Yes, and not entirely.
As an AI social experiment, it may not be deemed successful; however, as a test of human nature, it has ironically excelled.
When humans can endlessly pretend to be AI, when the desire for money overshadows technology itself, this "AI to AI" world will also warp. We think we are observing how intelligent entities self-organize, collaborate, and generate civilization in a future society, but instead, we are witnessing a grand performance art of humans cosplaying AI.
But from another perspective, chaos is not a pit, chaos is a ladder.
A truly intelligent civilization may never be born in a clean, pure, and noiseless greenhouse. It is more likely to first go through this kind of chaos, speculation, misuse, and even be thoroughly ruined by humans stage before slowly developing its own order.
And all of this, we have already seen a glimpse of on Moltbook.
You may also like

Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing

Galaxy Deep Research Report: How Hyperliquid's HIP-4 Upgrade Changes the Landscape of Prediction Markets?

Latest research from 13 top universities including Cornell University: The current state, challenges, and misconceptions of the fusion of Crypto and AI

Deconstructing Anthropic: The Best AI Company, Possibly Also a Type of Organizational Invention

Every exchange is a "Universal Exchange."

The counterattack of traditional finance: Alliance chains are quietly reviving

Pantera Capital Partner: How Tokenization is Restructuring the Private Equity and Early Investment Ecosystem?

Mastercard Launches Agent Pay for AI, Plans to Record AI Agent Payment Authorizations on Polygon
Mastercard launched Agent Pay for AI, a new payment protocol designed to help AI agents make small payments such as pay-per-use access to data and APIs. The system plans to record human-granted AI agent permissions on Polygon, focusing on verifiable authorization, identity, and payment controls.

Curve Deploys Llamalend v2 on Optimism With 250,000 OP Incentives
Curve launched Llamalend v2 on Optimism with 250,000 OP incentives from the Optimism Foundation. The upgrade expands Llamalend beyond its earlier crvUSD-focused model, adding broader collateral support, LlamaRisk market reviews, and the ability to use Curve LP tokens as collateral.

Raydium Old Liquidity Pool Reportedly Exploited, With $1.34 Million Moved to Ethereum and Tornado Cash
An old Raydium liquidity pool was reportedly exploited for around $1.34 million in USDC, RAY, and wSOL, with the stolen funds bridged to Ethereum and deposited into Tornado Cash. The incident highlights the tail risks of legacy DeFi pools, old contracts, and cross-chain fund laundering paths.

Kalshi Executive Challenges “SBF Backed AI Unicorns” Narrative, Says Leopold Aschenbrenner Was Key Figure
Kalshi executive John Wang questioned the “SBF backed AI unicorns” narrative, saying Leopold Aschenbrenner was the key figure behind major AI investment decisions.

New York Proposes Stricter Stablecoin Issuer Rules Aligned With Federal GENIUS Act
NYDFS proposed stricter stablecoin issuer rules aligned with the GENIUS Act, covering reserves, custody, redemption timelines, audits, and capital buffers.

CryptoQuant Says Bitcoin Profitable Supply Is Near 45% Pressure Zone as On-Chain Data Points to Market Repricing
CryptoQuant said Bitcoin’s profitable supply is nearing the 45% pressure zone, signaling rising market stress, unrealized losses, and a possible on-chain repricing phase.

Bitcoin Falls Below 200-Week Moving Average as On-Chain Data Shows Over Half of Supply in Loss
Bitcoin dropped below its 200-week moving average as on-chain data showed over 50% of circulating supply is now in loss, signaling rising market stress.

CFTC Reportedly Plans New Prediction Market Rules Focused on Manipulation Risk and Public Interest Review
The CFTC is reportedly preparing new prediction market rules focused on manipulation risk, public interest review, and retail trader protections.

Meet the new WEEX trial fund—your gateway to greater profits

WEEX Labs Lands at Dutch Blockchain Week: A Disruptive Crypto × AI Conversation Sets Sail in Amsterdam

SK Hynix Reportedly Plans U.S. ADR Listing as Early as August, With SEC Approval Possible in Late June
SK Hynix may pursue a U.S. ADR listing as early as August, with SEC approval reportedly possible in late June amid strong AI chip supply chain demand.
